10 comments

Add a comment…

Sign in

prestine

Your email address

Check!

invalid email

(thinking…)

Reset

or sign in with

• 
• 

UserVoice password

Forgot password?

Create a password

Your name

I agree to the terms of service

You'll receive a confirmation email with a link to create a password (optional).

Signed in as (Sign out)

Close

Close

Post comment Submitting...

• kelly commented  ·  August 30, 2011  ·  Flag as inappropriate  ·  Delete

  Yes! I also need SqlDependency for Caching purposes.

• stakmur commented  ·  March 15, 2011  ·  Flag as inappropriate  ·  Delete

  News -- Now Available: Windows Server 2008 R2 on Amazon EC2
  http://aws.typepad.com/aws/2011/03/now-available-windows-2008-r2-on-amazon-ec2.html

• stakmur commented  ·  February 24, 2011  ·  Flag as inappropriate  ·  Delete

  Without service broker on azure, it forces us to use AWS windows instances since we cannot duplicate the functionality any other way in azure. Since there is total silence on a roadmap for ssb on azure, AWS is our current plan forward.

• fastmike commented  ·  February 02, 2011  ·  Flag as inappropriate  ·  Delete

  ssb transport and dialog security should be part of azure...real advantages would be realized if this was implemented!!!

• simnova commented  ·  December 06, 2010  ·  Flag as inappropriate  ·  Delete

  Need SqlDependency for Caching purposes.

• Jamie Thomson commented  ·  November 12, 2010  ·  Flag as inappropriate  ·  Delete

  PL,
  If I can access AppFabric Service Bus using T-SQL, then yes. If not, no.

  Guess which it is!! :)

  Besides, queues in the DB offer benefits over Service Bus such as being backed up with the DB. Not saying Service Bus is not valuable but its not an either/or - both are suited to certain scenarios.

• PL commented  ·  August 28, 2010  ·  Flag as inappropriate  ·  Delete

  Does Azure AppFabric Service Bus not meet the scenario requirements for those folks looking to use SErvice Broker?

• stakmur commented  ·  August 24, 2010  ·  Flag as inappropriate  ·  Delete

  Yes! This is my highest priority too.

• Jamie Thomson commented  ·  April 07, 2010  ·  Flag as inappropriate  ·  Delete

  This is absolutely top of my list. Service Broker ASAP please :)

• firesnake commented  ·  December 20, 2009  ·  Flag as inappropriate  ·  Delete

  SQL Broker is the best & most beautiful technology ever to come out of MS.