Yoel Arnon
-
62 votes
Yoel Arnon gave this 3 votes ·
-
804 votesplanned ·
AdminHaris Majeed
(Admin, Microsoft Windows Azure)
responded
At PDC 2010, we announced that the Web role will soon provide full IIS functionality, which enables multiple IIS sites per Web role and the ability to install IIS modules. The full IIS functionality enables developers to get more value out of a Windows Azure instance. Full IIS Support will be generally available to customers later this year.
Please let us know if there are important scenarios that the combination of admin mode + full IIS won’t solve for you.
Yoel Arnon gave this 1 vote ·
-
1,084 votes
Yoel Arnon gave this 1 vote ·
-
2,422 votesplanned ·
AdminHaris Majeed
(Admin, Microsoft Windows Azure)
responded
We’re working on ways to provide free and low cost onramps for developers, and expect to make more announcements in 2011. Today, there are already multiple ways for developers to get onto Azure cost effectively:
Free Introductory Offer – provides a limited monthly quota of Azure resources at no cost, with standard rates applying above those thresholds: http://www.microsoft.com/windowsazure/offers/
MSDN Premium, Ultimate, and BizSpark Subscription Benefit – provides significantly higher free quotas of Azure resources to MSDN subscribers for several months: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/subscriptions/ee461076.aspx
Cloud Essentials for Partners – provides free/low cost access to Azure resources to members of the Microsoft Partner Network. http://www.microsoftcloudpartner.com/
Yoel Arnon gave this 3 votes ·
-
2,722 votescompleted ·
AdminCalvin
(Product Planner, Windows Azure, Microsoft Windows Azure)
responded
At PDC 2010 Microsoft announced the Extra Small Instance, which will be priced at $0.05 per compute hour in order to make the process of development, testing and trial easier. This will make it affordable for developers interested in running smaller applications on the platform. A beta of this role will be available before the end of 2010.
Please let us know if this addresses your needs for a more cost effective Azure offering.
Yoel Arnon gave this 2 votes ·
That would require MS to change of the MSMQ storage model - which is based on local memory-mapped files - but I agree it worth the effort. It would allow many existing MSMQ based LOB applications to have a smooth transition to Azure, and a better communication model between on premise and Azure apps.
Good to know MSMQ is still so relevant, almost 16 years since I started working on it in the Microsoft "Falcon" (MSMQ) development team.
Yoel - www.msmq.biz